From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Janih M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 7, 2004
8 A.D.3d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2004-00787.

Decided June 7, 2004.

In related child neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the Law Guardian and the petitioner appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated January 27, 2004, as, after a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act § 1028, granted the mother's motion for the return of the subject children to her custody under the petitioner's supervision. By decision and order on motion of this court dated February 6, 2004, enforcement of the order was stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Pamela Seider Dolgow and Suzanne K. Colt of counsel), for petitioner-appellant.

Brad M. Nacht, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent-respondent Lavasha M. Monica Drinane, New York, N.Y. (Marcia Egger of counsel), nonparty-appellant pro se.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith before a different Judge.

The evidence presented as to the mother's failure to appropriately supervise her four-month-old twins, her temporary renunciation of them, her use of corporal punishment on the seven-and five-year-old children, and testimony that she left her four youngest children home alone under the supervision of their seven-year-old sister, was sufficient to establish that the children were at imminent risk of harm. Accordingly, the Family Court erred in granting the mother's motion for the return of her children. In light of the evidence, the safer course is to not return the children to their mother's custody pending a full fact-finding hearing ( see Matter of Robert H., 307 A.D.2d 293; Matter of Marcos O., 270 A.D.2d 270; Matter of Child Welfare Admin. v. Danielle R., 225 A.D.2d 692).

RITTER, J.P., TOWNES, MASTRO and SKELOS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Janih M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 7, 2004
8 A.D.3d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Janih M

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JANIH M. (ANONYMOUS). ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 7, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
777 N.Y.S.2d 748

Citing Cases

Xavier v. Francesca

Moreover, the mother's responses during the hearing on the instant matter indicate that she did not…

Solomon v. Denise

The mother also admitted that she failed to keep an appointment with her psychiatrist and neglected to take…