From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Hicks v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 15, 2000
273 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: June 15, 2000

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

John Hicks, Alden, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of being under the influence of alcohol. According to the misbehavior report, two correction officers and a nurse observed that petitioner's breath smelled of alcohol, that petitioner was walking unsteadily, and that he had bloodshot eyes. In our view, the detailed misbehavior report, combined with the hearing testimony, provided substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Ross v. Goord, 262 A.D.2d 904). Notably, petitioner's denial of wrongdoing raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of De La Rosa v. Portuondo, 247 A.D.2d 810, 811). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his challenge to the sufficiency of the Hearing Officer's statement of evidence relied upon, have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Hicks v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 15, 2000
273 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

In the Matter of Hicks v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOHN HICKS, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, AS DIRECTOR OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 15, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
710 N.Y.S.2d 551

Citing Cases

Nicholson v. Goord

Although the results of a urinalysis test were negative, the test was conducted only for drugs and not for…

In the Matter of Panek v. Goord

We are unpersuaded by petitioner's contention that the use of and positive test readings from the…