From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Hermany Farms v. Chapin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 2001
287 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued September 21, 2001.

October 15, 2001.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Diana Chapin, as Executive Direction of the New York City Water Board, dated April 24, 2000, which confirmed a finding of the respondent Lawrence Schatt, as Deputy Commissioner of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection, that the petitioner had an outstanding balance of $103,175.66 in water and sewer charges, and that there was no accord and satisfaction reducing the amount due, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated January 8, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Butler, Fitzgerald Potter, New York, N.Y. (David K. Fiveson of counsel), for appellant.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N Y (Leonard Koerner and Kristin M. Helmers of counsel), for respondents.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding, since the determination under review was neither arbitrary and capricious nor contrary to law (see, Matter of 333 E. 89 Realty v. New York City Water Bd., 272 A.D.2d 549, 550; Rox Riv 83 Partners v. Ettinger, 240 A.D.2d 389, 390).

KRAUSMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, SCHMIDT and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Hermany Farms v. Chapin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 2001
287 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In the Matter of Hermany Farms v. Chapin

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF HERMANY FARMS, INC., appellant, v. DIANA CHAPIN, ETC., ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 663

Citing Cases

Snaggs v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Envtl. Prot.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.We agree with the Supreme Court's determination denying the…