From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Harris v. Fletcher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 29, 2006
30 A.D.3d 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

99468.

June 29, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Damecha Harris, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.


Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the loss of state property because he was not in possession of his state-issued razor. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. The misbehavior report, the razor issue log and memorandum from the author of the misbehavior report provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Hemphill v. Selsky, 26 AD3d 548). Although petitioner testified that he surrendered the razor prior to leaving the correctional facility for the court appearance, this evidence, which conflicted with the information in the memorandum and razor log, presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Williams v. Ricks, 303 AD2d 860, 861; Matter of Knowles v. Coombe, 236 AD2d 659). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the record establishes that the determination of guilt was a result of the evidence presented and not from any alleged bias on the part of respondent Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Costello v. Smith, 26 AD3d 566). To the extent that petitioner claims that he was precluded from introducing documentary evidence in support of his defense, the issue is raised for the first time in this proceeding and, therefore, it is not preserved for our review ( see Matter of Horton v. Allard, 25 AD3d 1048). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Harris v. Fletcher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 29, 2006
30 A.D.3d 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Harris v. Fletcher

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAMECHA HARRIS, Petitioner, v. JEFF FLETCHER, as Hearing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 29, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5191
819 N.Y.S.2d 311

Citing Cases

Verdi v. Collado

Petitioner's exculpatory contention that he was never issued a replacement razor created a credibility issue…

Verdi v. Collado

Petitioner's exculpatory contention that he was never issued a replacement razor created a credibility issue…