From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Grunkorn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 2004
6 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

94736.

Decided and Entered: April 15, 2004.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 9, 2003, which dismissed claimant's appeal from a decision of an Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

David H. Grunkorn, Mount Kisco, appellant pro se.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

By decision of an Administrative Law Judge dated and mailed October 23, 2002, claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct. By letter postmarked June 2, 2003, claimant appealed the decision to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. Although he testified that he received the Administrative Law Judge's decision, claimant offered no valid excuse for his failure to comply with the 20-day statutory period set forth in Labor Law § 621 (1). Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision dismissing the appeal as untimely ( see Matter of Esposito [Commissioner of Labor], 2 A.D.3d 1036; Matter of Del Valle [Commissioner of Labor], 285 A.D.2d 888). Claimant's arguments relating to the underlying merits of the denial of his application for unemployment insurance benefits are, therefore, not properly before this Court ( see id.).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Grunkorn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 2004
6 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Grunkorn

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF DAVID H. GRUNKORN, Appellant. COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 15, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 457

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Tomao

We affirm. Claimant offered no reasonable excuse for his failure to appeal the ALJ's decision within 20 days…

In the Matter of Plotnik

Although that decision notified claimant that he had 20 days in which to appeal, he failed to read all of the…