From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fullwood v. Lamy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 27, 2006
28 A.D.3d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

95759.

April 27, 2006.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Malone, Jr., J.), entered February 13, 2004 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Central Office Review Committee denying his grievance.

James Fullwood, Romulus, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III and Peters, JJ., concur.


Petitioner, an inmate, filed a grievance protesting the disallowance of his request for a copy of an investigative report which had been prepared in connection with a prior grievance that he had filed. The Central Office Review Committee (hereinafter CORC) denied petitioner's grievance and advised him that he was free to seek such a report via a Freedom of Information Law request. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial of his grievance. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal, and we affirm.

Department of Correctional Services Directive No. 4040 § VI (J), in pertinent part, provides: "No grievance documents shall be disseminated to persons other than the grievant, a direct party, or an individual involved in the review process without the approval of the Grievance supervisor." Petitioner argues that this language mandates that he be given a copy of the investigative report filed in connection with his previous grievance. CORC interprets this regulation as one addressing the confidentiality of files, not a mandate to turn over all documents in the file to the grievant. As we regard CORC's determination to be based upon a rational and reasonable interpretation of the directive, we defer to it ( see Matter of Marzec v. DeBuono, 95 NY2d 262, 266; Matter of Elcor Health Servs. v. Novello, 295 AD2d 772, 774, affd 100 NY2d 273 ). Petitioner's additional argument that this Court is bound by the principles of collateral estoppel and res judicata to follow an unreported decision of Supreme Court, Ulster County, is without merit.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Fullwood v. Lamy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 27, 2006
28 A.D.3d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Fullwood v. Lamy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES FULLWOOD, Appellant, v. FRED LAMY, as Commissioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 27, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3127
814 N.Y.S.2d 328

Citing Cases

Vidal v. Goord

Although the Department of Correctional Services Directive No. 4910 § VI (D) sets forth options for the…

Muggelberg v. Annucci

.S.2d 370, 958 N.E.2d 548 [2011]; Matter of Lugo v. Goord, 49 A.D.3d 1114, 1115, 853 N.Y.S.2d 747 [2008], lv.…