From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Francisco R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 2005
19 A.D.3d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-04640.

June 13, 2005.

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of abandonment, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Richardson, J.), dated April 22, 2004, which denied her motion to vacate her default in appearing at the fact-finding hearing.

Francine Shraga, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Kimberly C. Dixon, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Gary Solomon of counsel), and Proskauer Rose, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Nathan Lander of counsel), Law Guardian for the child (one brief filed).

Before: Santucci, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

"The determination whether to relieve a party of an order entered upon his or her default is a matter left to the sound discretion of the Family Court" ( Matter of Samantha P., 297 AD2d 348; see Matter of Samaria Ann B., 293 AD2d 532). To vacate the order, the mother was obligated to show that there was a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense ( see Matter of Iris R., 295 AD2d 521, 522; Matter of Angel Joseph S., 282 AD2d 752; Matter of Latisha I., 238 AD2d 340). We agree with the Family Court that the mother did not make the requisite showing.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Francisco R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 2005
19 A.D.3d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Francisco R

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANCISCO R., JR. MIRACLE MAKERS, INC., Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 13, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
796 N.Y.S.2d 247

Citing Cases

Strickland v. Lewis

ORDERED that the order dated September 19, 2012, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or…

In re Petulla

Ordered that the order dated September 12, 2008, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. "`The…