From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Elufe v. Parrott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 8, 2004
6 A.D.3d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

94639.

Decided and Entered: April 8, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered July 10, 2003 in Clinton County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.

Eleggua Osun Elufe, Malone, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge three determinations finding him guilty of multiple disciplinary rule violations. Supreme Court granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction due to petitioner's failure to serve respondent or the Attorney General with an executed order to show cause as directed.

We affirm. Absent a showing that prison presented an obstacle to service beyond an inmate's control, failure to comply with the service requirements set forth in an order to show cause requires dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction (see Matter of Townes v Selsky, 309 A.D.2d 1106; Matter of Bennett v Selsky, 306 A.D.2d 597). Inasmuch as petitioner made no such showing here, the petition was properly dismissed.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Elufe v. Parrott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 8, 2004
6 A.D.3d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Elufe v. Parrott

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ELEGGUA OSUN ELUFE, Appellant, v. MICHAEL G. PARROTT, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 8, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
773 N.Y.S.2d 910

Citing Cases

Way v. Goord

Because petitioner failed to timely serve the Attorney General with a signed order to show cause, Supreme…

In re Appl. of Nedd-Miller v. Novello

Three of the cases involved prisoner Article 78 proceedings and in those cases, the courts found that since…