From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dana XX.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 27, 2006
28 A.D.3d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

98584.

April 27, 2006.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Connerton, J.), entered March 29, 2005, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, for an order of protection.

Kelly M. Corbett, Ithaca, for appellant.

Kuredin V. Eytina, Broome County Department of Social Services, Binghamton, for Broome County Department of Social Services, respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur.


The children who are the subject of the underlying Family Ct Act article 10 proceeding were born to respondent (hereinafter the mother) in 1993, 1995 and 1997. The mother and Brian YY., a nonparty, have a child together who is not the subject of this appeal. Petitioner filed a neglect petition against the mother, alleging, among other things, domestic violence and substance abuse by Brian YY. in the home. Family Court sustained the petition but suspended the judgment on numerous conditions, including that the mother consent to an order of protection requiring her to prevent contact between Brian YY. and the children named in the petition. Brian YY. now appeals from the order of protection that ensued.

Appellate counsel for Brian YY. seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to pursue on appeal ( see Anders v. California, 386 US 738; People v. Stokes, 95 NY2d 633). Upon our review of the record and submissions, we agree. With respect to the protective order, Brian YY. was not a party to that proceeding, did not seek to intervene despite having notice of the proceeding, and the order does not direct him to do or refrain from doing anything. Moreover, the order was issued with the consent of the children's mother, and she has not appealed from that order. Under these circumstances, Brian YY. is not an aggrieved party and, accordingly, has no basis to appeal from said order of protection ( see CPLR 5511; Matter of William XX. v. Broome County Dept. of Social Servs., 11 AD3d 735, 736).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.


Summaries of

In re Dana XX.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 27, 2006
28 A.D.3d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In re Dana XX.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DANA XX. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 27, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3132
814 N.Y.S.2d 760

Citing Cases

In re MN

At the conclusion of a dispositional hearing after a neglect finding, the court shall enter an order of…

Valenson v. Kenyon

The mother was not a custodial parent under the prior order, she sought no change in that status in the 2008…