From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Christopher S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2003
305 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-05278

Submitted April 17, 2003.

May 12, 2003.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), entered May 7, 2002, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, also entered May 7, 2002, made upon the appellant's admission, finding that the appellant had committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of burglary in the second degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the Commissioner of Social Services of Dutchess County for a period not to exceed one year. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order entered May 7, 2002.

Carol Kahn, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Ian G. Mac Donald, County Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Christian R. Cullen of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order of disposition is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the fact-finding order is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Dutchess County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

Upon our review of the allocution made at the fact-finding hearing, we find that reversal is required. While the Family Court fully advised the appellant of his rights prior to his admission, the record clearly indicates that the court failed to obtain an allocution from his mother, who was present in court, with regard to her understanding of any rights the appellant might be waiving as a result of his admission (see Family Court Act § 321.3; Matter of LeJuane S., 247 A.D.2d 481, 482; Matter of Shantique F., 223 A.D.2d 590, 591; Matter of Melvin A., 216 A.D.2d 227). Therefore, the order of disposition must be reversed, the fact-finding order vacated, and the matter remitted to the Family Court for further proceedings on the juvenile delinquency petition.

The appellant's remaining contentions either are without merit or have been rendered academic in light of our determination.

SANTUCCI, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, McGINITY and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Christopher S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2003
305 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Christopher S

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER S. (ANONYMOUS), appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 838

Citing Cases

MATTER OF JOSEPH G.

While respondent argues that he should be permitted to vacate his admission based upon his constitutional and…

In the Matter of Joseph G

If respondent indicates that he or she is voluntarily waiving a fact-finding hearing, the Court must then…