From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Christopher M. Uhl

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 6, 2011
88 A.D.3d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-6

In the Matter of Christopher M. UHL, an Attorney.Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner;Christopher M. UHL, Respondent.


Peter M. Torncello, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Elizabeth M. Devane of counsel), for petitioner.Before: MERCURE, J.P., SPAIN, MALONE JR., STEIN and EGAN JR., JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1993. He maintained an office for the practice of law in Massachusetts.

On July 28, 2010 in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, respondent was convicted after trial of six counts of tax evasion in violation of 26 USC § 7201—a serious crime as defined in Judiciary Law § 90(4)(d) ( see Matter of Rothenberg, 274 A.D.2d 738, 710 N.Y.S.2d 732 [2000]; Matter of Ng, 249 A.D.2d 679, 671 N.Y.S.2d 768 [1998] ). He was sentenced to 33 months in prison on each count, with the terms to run concurrently, followed by two years of supervised release. Respondent was also ordered to pay $360,904 in restitution and a $7,500 fine.

Petitioner now moves for an order imposing final discipline pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(g). Respondent has not replied to the motion.

Under the circumstances presented, which include “a pattern of tax evasion encompassing multiple years and substantial sums of money” ( Matter of Richichi, 52 A.D.3d 1109, 1109, 858 N.Y.S.2d 921 [2008] ), we conclude that respondent should be disbarred.

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another any opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys ( see 22 NYCRR 806.9).

MERCURE, J.P., SPAIN, MALONE Jr., STEIN and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Christopher M. Uhl

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 6, 2011
88 A.D.3d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Christopher M. Uhl

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Christopher M. UHL, an Attorney.Committee on Professional…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
930 N.Y.S.2d 491
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6974

Citing Cases

In re Adler

Notwithstanding the facts adduced by respondent in mitigation, we are not persuaded that a departure from…

In re Adler

Notwithstanding the facts adduced by respondent in mitigation, we are not persuaded that a departure from…