From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Chang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 13, 2004
7 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

94887.

Decided and Entered: May 13, 2004.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 6, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Mu-Chian Chang, Elizabethtown, appellant pro se.

Malcolm B. O'Hara, Glens Falls, for Norman Wolgin, respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Claimant was employed as an executive steward at a resort hotel and his responsibilities included approving the time records of his subordinates. Claimant was discharged from his employment after it was discovered that he was altering the times punched on his subordinates' time cards to reflect their scheduled work times rather than their actual arrival and departure times. It is well settled that an employee's falsification of time records may constitute misconduct (see Matter of Kelly [Commissioner of Labor], 288 A.D.2d 539). Here, claimant not only was counseled about complying with company policies and procedures, but was told by both the payroll manager and another director — who, claimant was aware, recently discharged another manager for similar conduct — that changing subordinates' time cards to reflect different arrival and departure times was not permitted. Claimant's denial that he was informed that such changes were prohibited and had been trained to alter the time sheets presented a credibility issue for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve (see Matter of Sonzogni [Gilmore Glassworks — Commissioner of Labor], 301 A.D.2d 939; Matter of Trahan [Commissioner of Labor], 273 A.D.2d 664). Claimant's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Chang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 13, 2004
7 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Chang

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF MU-CHIAN CHANG, Appellant. NORMAN WOLGIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 13, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
776 N.Y.S.2d 653

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Phillips

Here, claimant admitted to providing deceptive information on the expense forms, but asserted that she…

In the Matter of Newkirk

We affirm. It is well settled that an employee's falsification of time records may constitute disqualifying…