From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Burrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 12, 2004
3 A.D.3d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-06692.

Decided on January 12, 2004.

Motion by the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts to strike the respondent's name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4), upon his felony conviction. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on January 17, 1979.

Diana Maxfield Kearse, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Melissa D. Broder of counsel), for petitioner.

Robert Stephen Burrick, respondent pro se.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN and GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


OPINION ORDER


The respondent was convicted upon his plea of guilty on January 13, 2003, to the crimes of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and 1342, and interstate transport of stolen property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 and 2312. He was sentenced on April 14, 2003, to concurrent terms of 18 months imprisonment. Upon his release from prison the respondent will be placed on supervised release for concurrent terms of three years. The judgment directed the respondent to make restitution as follows: $37,094.73 to Chubb Insurance, $7,624.16 to Pitney Hardin, and $3,616.89 to Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund.

The petitioner contends that the Federal felony of interstate transportation of property obtained by fraud bears essential similarity to a New York felony, thereby warranting the respondent's automatic disbarment. As set forth in Matter of Jacobs ( 246 A.D.2d 273, 274):

The Federal felony of interstate transportation of property obtained by fraud is cognizable in New York as criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, a class D felony ( see Penal Law § 170.25; Matter of Holland, 108 A.D.2d 63; see also Matter of Barbara, 86 A.D.2d 219; Matter of Kilcullen, 55 A.D.2d 437).

Any attorney convicted of a felony shall, upon such conviction, cease to be an attorney and counselor-at-law, or to be competent to practice law as such. By virtue of the respondent's conviction of a felony, he was automatically disbarred at the time of his conviction.

Notwithstanding the respondent's offer to temporarily suspend himself pending an adjournment of the time in which to respond to the petitioner's motion to strike his name from the roll of attorneys, the respondent's disbarment was automatic upon his felony conviction.

Accordingly, the petitioner's motion is granted, the respondent is disbarred, and, effective immediately, his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Robert Stephen Burrick, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent shall comply with this court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys ( see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, Robert Stephen Burrick, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Burrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 12, 2004
3 A.D.3d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Burrick

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT STEPHEN BURRICK, AN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR-AT-LAW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 12, 2004

Citations

3 A.D.3d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
770 N.Y.S.2d 729

Citing Cases

Matter of Daly

The respondent also had to pay a penalty of $200 and $200,000 in restitution. The federal felony crime of…

In re Thies

Additionally, this Court has held that "[t]he federal felony crime of interstate transmittal of stolen money…