From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Bongiorno v. Bongiorno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 2003
1 A.D.3d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2003-00250

Submitted October 10, 2003.

November 17, 2003.

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Antonina Bongiorno appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Heffernan, J.), dated December 16, 2002, which, after a hearing, dismissed her petition for an order of protection against Andrea Bongiorno.

Larry S. Bachner, Jamaica, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, BARRY A. COZIER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly dismissed the petition upon its finding that the petitioner failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent committed acts constituting a cognizable family offense ( see Family Ct Act § 832). The determination whether the respondent committed such acts was a disputed factual issue for the Family Court to resolve. As the trier of fact, its determination regarding the credibility of the witnesses is entitled to great weight ( see Matter of Pearsall v. Martin-Zenick, 267 A.D.2d 240), and we find no basis to reverse its determination.

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

KRAUSMAN, J.P., McGINITY, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Bongiorno v. Bongiorno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 2003
1 A.D.3d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Bongiorno v. Bongiorno

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ANTONINA BONGIORNO, appellant, v. ANDREA BONGIORNO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 17, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 276

Citing Cases

Washington v. Washington

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The determination as to whether a…

Santiago v. Friedman

The fair preponderance of the credible evidence adduced at the hearing supported the determination of the…