From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Benedetto

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 9, 2001
167 N.J. 280 (N.J. 2001)

Opinion

May 9, 2001.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-022 concluding pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(c), that CONRAD J. BENEDETTO of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded on the basis of respondent's conviction in South Carolina of a misdemeanor offense for practicing law in that state without a license to do so, conduct in violation of RPC 5.5(a), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CONRAD J. BENEDETTO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate a4ministrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Benedetto

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 9, 2001
167 N.J. 280 (N.J. 2001)
Case details for

In the Matter of Benedetto

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF CONRAD J. BENEDETTO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 9, 2001

Citations

167 N.J. 280 (N.J. 2001)
770 A.2d 1155

Citing Cases

In re Velahos

See, e.g., In re Benedetto, 167 N.J. 280 (2001) (reprimand for attorney who pleaded guilty to the…

In re Nadel

" Next, counsel argues that reprimands ordinarily are imposed in matters involving the unauthorized practice…