From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Duffy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 2004
5 A.D.3d 476 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-10775.

Decided March 8, 2004.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured/underinsured motorist claim, in which Angelina Duffy cross-petitioned, inter alia, to add Merchants Mutual Insurance Company as a party and to compel it to proceed to arbitration of her claim for uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits, Merchants Mutual Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated October 10, 2002, as granted those branches of the cross petition which were to add it as a party and to compel it to proceed to arbitration of Angelina Duffy's claim for uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits against it.

Callahan Malone, Mineola, N.Y. (Anne V. Malone of counsel), for proposed additional respondent-appellant.

Marshall Marshall, Jericho, N.Y. (Richard Steigman of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Larry Dorman, P.C., Astoria, N.Y., for respondent-respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, THOMAS A. ADAMS, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

Whether Angelina Duffy is entitled to uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits under a policy issued by Merchants Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Merchants) relates to whether certain conditions of coverage were satisfied, not whether the parties agreed to arbitrate. Accordingly, because the appellant failed to seek a stay of Angelina Duffy's demand for arbitration of her claim for those benefits within the 20-day limitation period set forth in CPLR 7503(c), the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of Duffy's cross petition which were to add Merchants as a party and to compel it to proceed to arbitration ( see CPLR 7503[c]; Matter of Steck, 89 N.Y.2d 1082, 1084; Matter of Merchants Mut. Ins. Co. v. Anemone, 271 A.D.2d 690; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rosado, 271 A.D.2d 527, 528; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 271 A.D.2d 443).

RITTER, J.P., SANTUCCI, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Duffy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 2004
5 A.D.3d 476 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Duffy

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, petitioner-respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 8, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 476 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
772 N.Y.S.2d 588

Citing Cases

Yvonne T. v. Kirkland

The record revcals"that on October 6. 2008. Citibank served plaintiffs with notice of its "intention to…

In the Matter of Am. Country Ins. Co. v. Kabir

Contrary to the conclusion of the Supreme Court, since American Country Insurance Company failed to seek a…