From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Alaric Osorio v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 22, 2011
87 A.D.3d 1206 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-09-22

In the Matter of Alaric OSORIO, Petitioner,v.Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.


Alaric Osorio, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling, conspiring to sell drugs and forwarding calls to third parties. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charges and the determination was affirmed on administrative

appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to forwarding calls to third parties. Therefore, he is precluded from challenging the part of the determination finding him guilty of this charge ( see Matter of Correnti v. Fischer, 83 A.D.3d 1354, 1354, 921 N.Y.S.2d 720 [2011]; Matter of Martinez v. Fischer, 82 A.D.3d 1380, 1380, 919 N.Y.S.2d 541 [2011] ). As for the remaining charges, respondent concedes that substantial evidence does not support the determination of guilt and that the determination must be annulled to that extent. Upon reviewing the record, we agree. Inasmuch as a loss of good time was imposed, however, the matter must be remitted to respondent for a reassessment of the penalty on the remaining charge ( see Matter of Minton v. Fischer, 73 A.D.3d 1347, 1348, 899 N.Y.S.2d 916 [2010], appeal dismissed 15 N.Y.3d 848, 909 N.Y.S.2d 24, 935 N.E.2d 816 [2010] ). Petitioner's further claim that the Hearing Officer was biased is not substantiated by the record and there is no indication that the determination flowed from any alleged bias ( see Matter of Hernandez v. Fischer, 79 A.D.3d 1544, 1546, 917 N.Y.S.2d 714 [2010], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 710, 2011 WL 1584763 [2011]; Matter of Wilcox v. Fischer, 78 A.D.3d 1394, 1395, 911 N.Y.S.2d 250 [2010] ).

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of smuggling and conspiring to sell drugs and imposed a penalty; petition granted to that extent, respondent is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner's institutional record and matter remitted to respondent for an administrative redetermination of the penalty on the remaining violation; and, as so modified, confirmed.

PETERS, J.P., ROSE, MALONE JR., McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Alaric Osorio v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 22, 2011
87 A.D.3d 1206 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Alaric Osorio v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Alaric OSORIO, Petitioner,v.Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 22, 2011

Citations

87 A.D.3d 1206 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
929 N.Y.S.2d 776
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6508

Citing Cases

Turner v. Fischer

We also conclude that the determination finding petitioner guilty of assaulting staff, engaging in violent…

Turner v. Fischer

We also conclude that the determination finding petitioner guilty of assaulting staff, engaging in violent…