From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Interest of P. E. M. III

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 19, 1990
395 S.E.2d 359 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

A90A1314.

DECIDED JUNE 19, 1990.

Deprivation petition. Hart Juvenile Court. Before Judge Grant.

Lipscomb, Johnson Ashway, David L. Dickinson, for appellant.

Daniel J. Parker, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Carol A. Cosgrove, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


P. E. M.'s maternal grandparents filed a deprivation petition in the Juvenile Court of Hart County seeking a determination that their grandson was deprived under OCGA § 15-11-2 (8). The child's parents filed responsive pleadings denying that the child was deprived. Prior to the filing of the grandparent's petition, P. E. M.'s parents were involved in divorce proceedings in South Carolina, and a temporary order awarded custody of the child to his mother. The child and mother came to Georgia and resided with her parents. The parents reconciled, and the divorce action was dismissed. The juvenile court entered an order on February 6, 1990, denying the petition, but ordered further relief, including orders that the child was to reside with the parents only on weekends during the month of March and after that month was to return to the custody of his parents, that the parents attend Parents Anonymous meetings, that the South Carolina Department of Social Services supervise the family, and that the grandparents have certain weekend and vacation visitation privileges. The parents appeal. Held:

OCGA § 15-11-33 (a) requires the court to make certain findings as to whether the child is deprived. "if the court finds that the child is not a deprived child ..., it shall dismiss the petition and order the child discharged from any detention or other restriction theretofore ordered in the proceeding."

As P. E. M. was not found to be deprived, the juvenile court erred in not dismissing the petition.

Appellee's motion to dismiss because the judgment was not final is without merit, and it is denied.

Judgment reversed. Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.


DECIDED JUNE 19, 1990.


Summaries of

In the Interest of P. E. M. III

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 19, 1990
395 S.E.2d 359 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

In the Interest of P. E. M. III

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF P. E. M. III, a child

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 19, 1990

Citations

395 S.E.2d 359 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)
196 Ga. App. 34

Citing Cases

In the Interest of W.P.B

It is from the imposition of these conditions that the mother appeals. Therefore, since the issue of…

In the Interest of C.F

Since the children were not found to be deprived, the court, in dismissing DFACS's deprivation complaint in…