From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Illinois
Aug 1, 2023
No. 15-09539 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Aug. 1, 2023)

Opinion

15-09539

08-01-2023

In Re: Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc., Debtor.


Chapter 7

ORDER ON FIRST AND FINAL APPLICATION FOR ALLOWANCE AND PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES OF DIAMOND MCCARTHY LLP AS SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE TRUSTEE (DOCKET 1265) AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN SUPPORT THEREOF

HON. JACQUELINE P. COX, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

This matter coming before the Court on the First and Final Application for Allowance of Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses of J. Gregory Taylor and the law firm of Diamond McCarthy LLP (collectively, "Diamond McCarthy"), (the "Application"), as Special Counsel to Michael K. Desmond, not individually but solely in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee (the "Trustee") for the Bankruptcy Estate of Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc., due notice having been given and the Court having considered the Application and the statements of counsel appearing before the Court, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1) The relief requested in the Application is granted in part and denied in part, as is set forth below;

2.) Diamond McCarthy's request to limit notice of the hearing on the Application is granted;

3.) All objections to the Application or the relief requested therein that have not been made, withdrawn, waived, or settled, and all reservations of rights included therein, are overruled on the merits;

4.) Diamond McCarthy's request for payment of contingency fees in the amount of $1,208,277.75 ("fees") for legal services rendered to the Trustee for the period October 26, 2017 through May 31,2023 is hereby granted;

5.) Diamond McCarthy's request for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses in the amount of $979,305.62 ("expenses") incurred in connection with the legal services rendered to the Trustee is hereby denied in the amount of $6,258.41, and granted in the allowed amount of $973,047.21;

6.) The Trustee is hereby authorized to pay to Diamond McCarthy the net sum of $2,181,324.96, which represents compensation for fees ($1,208,277.75), plus reimbursement of Diamond McCarthy's expenses ($973,047.21), for legal services rendered to the Trustee.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Support of Order for Allowance and Payment of Compensation and Reimbursable Expenses to Diamond McCarthy LLP, Special Counsel to the Trustee (Docket 1265)

Total Fees Requested: $1,208,277.75 Total Costs Requested: $979,305.62

Fees Disallowed: $0.00 Costs Disallowed: $6,258.41

Total Fees Allowed: $1,208,277.75 Total Costs Allowed: $973,047.21

Total Fees and Costs Requested: $2,187,583.37

Total Fees and Costs Allowed: $2,181,324.96

I. Rationale for the Disallowed Expenses

When seeking reimbursement of expenses, an applicant's "[f]ee application should include a detailed itemization of the expenses for which reimbursement is sought, including the date the expense was incurred, the type of expense, and the amount." In Re Lancelot Invs. Fund, L.P., Bankr. No. 08-28225, 2023 WL 3033303, at *1 (Bankr. N.D.Ill. Apr. 20, 2023) (citing In re Eckert, 414 B.R. 404,414-15 (Bankr. N.D.Ill. 2009)); see In re Wildman, 72 B.R. 700, 731 (Bankr. N.D.Ill. 1987)). The applicant has the burden to show that it is entitled to reimbursement of expenses. Id. (citing In re Eckert, 414 B.R. at 415).

For purposes of reimbursement, an expense is "necessary" if "it was incurred because it was required to accomplish proper representation of the client." Id. "The Court does not permit reimbursement for expenses that were not actually and necessarily incurred by the applicant." Id. (citing 11 U.S.C. §§ 330(a)(1)(B) & 331). The Court needs enough information about an expense to determine whether it was reasonable or necessary, which may include information about "why" the expense was charged or "what" the expense was used for. Id. (citing In re Earl Gaudio & Son, Inc., No. 13-90942, 2018 WL 3388917, at *16 (Bankr. CD. Ill. July 10, 2018)).

1. Research Expenses

Applicants who seek reimbursement for legal research expenses should note '"[t]he nature and purpose of the legal research'" and 'the entry should indicate what matter the material sought will be used in."' In re Leavens, Bankr. No. 21-12369,2023 WL 4552180, at *1 (Bankr. N.D.Ill. July 14,2023) (citing In Re Lancelot Invs. Fund, L.P.,2023 WL 3033303, at *2); see also In re Wildman, 72B.R. at 708). '"Entries of 'research,' 'legal research' or 'bankruptcy research'" will not suffice. Id. (citing In Re Lancelot Invs. Fund, L.P., 2023 WL 3033303, at *2); see also In re Wildman, 72 B.R. at 708; In re Meier, Bankr. Bankr. No. 14-10105, 2015 WL 1756775, at *6 (Bankr. N.D.Ill. Apr. 13, 2015)).

Courts in this district have denied reimbursement for expenses incurred for "Westlaw research" or "computer research" where the only details given were the "date the research was performed and the amount incurred," reasoning that without additional information, including "the nature of the topics researched and how the research was pertinent to the case," the Court was unable to determine whether the expenses were reasonable and necessary. Id. (citing In Re Lancelot Invs. Fund, L.P., 2023 WL 3033303, at *2).

This application requests reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $979,305,62, and $6,293.91 of these expenses were for On-Line Research expenses. See Application, Dkt. 1265 (part 1), f 23; Id., Diet. 1265 (part 4), Ex. B, Summary of Expenses. However, for many of these On-Line Research expenses, Applicant failed to describe the topics researched and how the research was pertinent to the case, and thus the request for reimbursement of expenses will b e disallowed in the amount of$6,258.41, and allowed in the amount of $973,047.21. See id., Ex. B, pp. 2-4,7-8. These expenses are detailed below, organized according; to the relevant categories of Applicant's application. Id.

Cost ID

Date

Description/Payee

Amount

146444

01/31/18

On-Line Research; Westlaw/January, 2018

$9.85

146995

02/28/18

On-Line Research; Westlaw/February, 2018

$22.92

147657

03/33/18

On-Line Research; Westlaw/March, 2018

$372,81

147659

03/31/18

On-Line Research; Westlaw/March, 2018

$1,050.47

148235

04/30/18

On-Line Research; Westlaw/April, 2018

$342.55

151029

09/30/18

On-Line Research; Westlaw/September 2018

$10.06

155375

04/30/19

On-Line Research; Westlaw/April

$178.28

157661

08/31/19

On-Line Research; Westlaw/August 2019

$138.31

160324

12/33/19

On-Line Research; Westlaw/December 2019

$47.59

161040

01/31/20

On-Line Research; Westlaw/January 2020

$1,453.63

171834

10/31/21

On-Line Research; Westlaw, October 2021

$2,009.08

176029

08/30/22

On-Line Research; Westlaw, August 2022

$622.86

Expenses Requested: $979,305.62 Amount Allowed: $973,047.21 (Reduction of $6,258.41)


Summaries of

In re Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Illinois
Aug 1, 2023
No. 15-09539 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Aug. 1, 2023)
Case details for

In re Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In Re: Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc., Debtor.

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Illinois

Date published: Aug 1, 2023

Citations

No. 15-09539 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Aug. 1, 2023)