From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wyatt

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
May 28, 2003
110 S.W.3d 511 (Tex. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. 10-03-078-CV.

Opinion delivered and filed May 28, 2003. Rehearing Overruled May 28, 2003.

Original Proceeding.

Motion for rehearing denied.

Sterling Wayne Wyatt, Ruth Ann Wyatt, Hewitt, pro se.

Tommy bastian, Barrett, Burke, Wilson, Castle, Daffin Frappier, Addison, for others.

Before Chief Justice DAVIS, Justice VANCE, and Justice GRAY.


OPINION DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING


On April 1, 2003, we denied the relators' motion for a writ of prohibition without an opinion. Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(d). They have filed a motion for rehearing, requesting clarification of the reason for our denial. A writ of prohibition may properly be used by this Court only to protect our jurisdiction. In re Salas, 994 S.W.2d 422, 423 (Tex.App.-Waco 1999, orig. proceeding). Its use is limited to cases in which this Court has actual jurisdiction of a pending proceeding. Id. The relators' petition does not assert any manner in which our jurisdiction is in jeopardy of being lost due to the events about which they are complaining.

Relators' motion for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

In re Wyatt

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
May 28, 2003
110 S.W.3d 511 (Tex. App. 2003)
Case details for

In re Wyatt

Case Details

Full title:IN RE STERLING WAYNE WYATT AND RUTH ANN WYATT

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: May 28, 2003

Citations

110 S.W.3d 511 (Tex. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Woodland Hills Apartments

The use of a writ of injunction is limited to cases in which we have actual jurisdiction of a pending…

In re Riggs

See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(a) ("Each court of appeals or a justice of a court of appeals may issue a…