From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re W.P.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Oct 20, 2020
609 S.W.3d 104 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 108211

10-20-2020

In the MATTER OF the Care and Treatment of: W.P.

FOR APPELLANT: Amy E. Lowe, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101. FOR RESPONDENT: Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.


FOR APPELLANT: Amy E. Lowe, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Philip M. Hess, J., and Michael E. Gardner, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM W.P. (Appellant) appeals from a jury verdict finding him a Sexually Violent Predator. Appellant timely filed this appeal. In Appellant's sole point on appeal, he argues the State failed to meet its burden of proof because no witness at trial adequately identified him to the jury.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err in concluding Appellant was adequately identified to the jury. A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

In re W.P.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Oct 20, 2020
609 S.W.3d 104 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

In re W.P.

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF the Care and Treatment of: W.P.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Oct 20, 2020

Citations

609 S.W.3d 104 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)