From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wise

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, Washington, W.D. Washington, Northern Division
Apr 6, 1914
212 F. 567 (W.D. Wash. 1914)

Opinion


212 F. 567 (W.D.Wash. 1914) In re WISE et al. No. 5136. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Northern Division. April 6, 1914

James A. Dougan, of Seattle, Wash., for petitioners.

Shorett, McLaren & Shorett, of Seattle, Wash., for bankrupts.

NETERER, District Judge.

A petition in involuntary bankruptcy was filed, and respondents answered denying bankruptcy. The issue thus raised was submitted to a jury, and a verdict returned in favor of respondent; motion for a new trial was made and denied; cost bill filed claiming, among other items, $20 attorney's fees. Objection to the taxation of attorney's fees and other costs is made.

It is contended by the petitioning creditors that section 3e of the Bankruptcy Act precludes the taxation of costs; such subdivision being:

'Whenever a petition is filed by any person for the purpose of having another adjudged a bankrupt, and an application is made to take charge of and hold the property of the alleged bankrupt, or any part of the same, prior to the adjudication and pending a hearing on the petition, the petitioner or applicant shall file in the same court a bond * * * to be approved by the court or judge thereof, * * * conditioned for the payment, in case such petition is dismissed, to the respondent, * * * all costs, expenses and damages occasioned by such seizure. * * * If such petition be dismissed by the court or withdrawn by the petitioner, the respondent or respondents shall be allowed all costs, counsel fees, expenses, and damages occasioned by said seizure. * * * Counsel fees, costs, expenses, and damages shall be fixed and allowed by the court. * * *'

It is manifest from a reading of this section that counsel fees, expenses, and damages provided for the seizing and holding of the property of an alleged bankrupt are for special services or damages occasioned by reason of the wrongful taking of the property of another. The counsel fees expended and damages provided by section 3e are a distinct matter and have no application to the instant case, and are not taxed in the bankruptcy proceeding, but are to be recovered in an independent suit upon the bond provided by this section. In re Hines (D.C.) 144 F. 147, 150.

The costs in this case are controlled by section 824 of the Revised Statutes and Rule 34, General Orders in Bankruptcy (89 F. xiii, 32 C.C.A. xxxiii). Section 824, Revised Statutes (U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 632), provides that on a trial in equity $20 attorney's fees shall be taxed in favor of the successful and against the losing party. Rule 34, General Orders in Bankruptcy, provides that in case of involuntary bankruptcy, where the debtor resists adjudication, the same costs that are allowed to a successful party in a suit in equity shall be

Page 569.

taxed. Under the chancery rule the $20 attorney's fee is taxable. In re Hines, supra.

I am conscious of the statement of Judge McPherson in Re Morris (D.C.) 115 F. 591, that 'there is no provision in the act for the allowance of counsel fees or damages, except under section 3e, and this applies when the bankrupt's property has been taken out of his possession,' and also note that he denied counsel fees in that case. This evidently was only intended to apply to counsel fees as a special service under section 3e, and not to the taxation of attorney's fees as costs under section 824 and rule 34, supra.

The objections to the cost bill are overruled.


Summaries of

In re Wise

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, Washington, W.D. Washington, Northern Division
Apr 6, 1914
212 F. 567 (W.D. Wash. 1914)
Case details for

In re Wise

Case Details

Full title:In re WISE et al.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, Washington, W.D. Washington, Northern Division

Date published: Apr 6, 1914

Citations

212 F. 567 (W.D. Wash. 1914)

Citing Cases

In re J. Ito Terusaki

same costs that are allowed to a successful party in a suit in equity Section 824, Rev. Stat. (Comp. St.…