From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Winbush

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 16, 2017
No. 16-7253 (4th Cir. Feb. 16, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-7253

02-16-2017

In Re: CALVIN WINBUSH, a/k/a Good Game, Petitioner.

Calvin Winbush, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:12-cr-00021-HEH-1; 3:14-cv-00724-HEH-RCY) Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin Winbush, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Calvin Winbush petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court ruled on the § 2255 motion, denying it and declining to grant a certificate of appealability. See United States v. Winbush, No. 3:12-cr-00021-HEH-RCY-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2016). Winbush's appeal of that order is pending in this court. See United States v. Winbush, No. 16-7527 (4th Cir.) (docketed Nov. 2, 2016). Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Winbush's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Winbush

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 16, 2017
No. 16-7253 (4th Cir. Feb. 16, 2017)
Case details for

In re Winbush

Case Details

Full title:In Re: CALVIN WINBUSH, a/k/a Good Game, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 16, 2017

Citations

No. 16-7253 (4th Cir. Feb. 16, 2017)