From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 23, 2017
No. 17-1918 (4th Cir. Oct. 23, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1918

10-23-2017

In re: SHANNON DERRELL WILLIAMS, a/k/a Doe, Petitioner.

Shannon Derrell Williams, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Extraordinary Writ. (3:02-cr-00085-JRS-1) Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shannon Derrell Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shannon Derrell Williams has filed a petition for a writ of audita querela, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2012), seeking to challenge his multiple life sentences. Williams concedes, however, that he has been denied relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012). A writ of audita querela is not available to a petitioner when other avenues of relief are available, such as a motion to vacate under § 2255. See United States v. Torres, 282 F.3d 1241, 1245 (10th Cir. 2002); United States v. Johnson, 962 F.2d 579, 582 (7th Cir. 1992) (explaining that audita querela may not be invoked by a defendant challenging the legality of his sentence who could otherwise raise that challenge under § 2255). The fact that Williams cannot proceed under § 2255 unless he obtains this court's authorization to file a successive motion does not alter this conclusion. See United States v. Valdez-Pacheco, 237 F.3d 1077, 1080 (9th Cir. 2001) ("A prisoner may not circumvent valid congressional limitations on collateral attacks by asserting that those very limitations create a gap in the postconviction remedies that must be filled by the common law writs.").

Accordingly, although we grant Williams' application to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for a writ of audita querela. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 23, 2017
No. 17-1918 (4th Cir. Oct. 23, 2017)
Case details for

In re Williams

Case Details

Full title:In re: SHANNON DERRELL WILLIAMS, a/k/a Doe, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 23, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1918 (4th Cir. Oct. 23, 2017)