From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re William

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2008
57 A.D.3d 1509 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. CAF 08-01335.

December 31, 2008.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Paul G. Buchanan, J.), entered May 1, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3. The order, among other things, adjudged that respondent is a juvenile delinquent.

DAVID C. SCHOPP, LAW GUARDIAN, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL), FOR Respondent-Appellant.

CHERYL A. GREEN, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. LISZEWSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-Respondent.

Before: Martoche, J.P., Smith, Centra, Green and Pine, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating him to be a juvenile delinquent based on the finding that he committed the crime of unlawful possession of weapons by persons under 16 (Penal Law § 265.05). That statute expressly provides that "[a] person who violates the provisions of [section 265.05] shall be adjudged a juvenile delinquent." Respondent contends that Family Court erred in refusing to suppress the gun without conducting a hearing because he was illegally searched by the school principal. We reject that contention. A suppression hearing was unnecessary inasmuch as respondent's "allegations on their face `did not lay out a factual scenario which, if credited, would have warranted suppression'" ( Matter of Elvin G., 47 AD3d 527, 527, quoting People v Coleman, 82 NY2d 415, 432). According to respondent, the principal confronted him based on information from another student that respondent was in possession of a gun in his book bag. "Under ordinary circumstances, a search of a student by a . . . school official will be `justified at its inception' when there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated or is violating . . . the law" ( New Jersey v T. L. O., 469 US 325, 341-342) and, here, respondent "did not present a legal basis upon which to challenge the [principal's] conduct" ( Elvin G., 47 AD3d at 527-528).


Summaries of

In re William

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2008
57 A.D.3d 1509 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re William

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM P., Appellant. ERIE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 1509 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 10418
870 N.Y.S.2d 664

Citing Cases

Hirsch v. New York City Dept. of Educ.

The school's March 2009 search, which was based on the report of identified individuals that Yitzchak was…