From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wiley

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Dec 7, 2021
No. 07-20-00039-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 7, 2021)

Opinion

07-20-00039-CV

12-07-2021

IN RE: THE COMMITMENT OF ANTHONY BERNARD WILEY


On Appeal from the 89th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. 186, 685-C; Honorable Charles Barnard, Presiding

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.

ORDER ON SECOND MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Per Curiam

On August 11, 2021, this court affirmed a jury finding that Appellant, Anthony Bernard Wiley, is a sexually violent predator. Wiley's motion for rehearing was denied on August 31, 2021, and his Motion for En Banc Reconsideration or to Recuse was denied on November 4, 2021. Pending before this court is Appellant's Second Motion for En Banc Reconsideration or to Recuse filed by Wiley. The issue of recusal was heretofore certified to the four justices of this court and pursuant to Rule 16.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the request was denied. The court now considers the portion of Wiley's second motion by which he requests en banc reconsideration of our prior opinion. The request is denied with these additional comments.

See In re Commitment of Wiley, No. 07-20-00039-CV, 2021 Tex.App. LEXIS 6609, at *12 (Tex. App.-Amarillo Aug. 11, 2021, no pet. h.) (mem. op.).

As Wiley has acknowledged, Rule 41.2(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that en banc consideration is not favored. Tex.R.App.P. 41.2(c).

Wiley contends this court incorrectly determined that he is a repeat sexually violent offender under the Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predator's Act. Without presenting any new arguments, he again maintains the evidence is insufficient to show that he has "more than one sexually violent offense" because he maintains that his burglary conviction is not a sexually violent offense.

The Act defines a "sexually violent offense" as an offense under section 21.02 (continuous sexual abuse of a child), section 21.11(a)(1) (indecency with a child younger than seventeen), section 22.011 (sexual assault), or section 22.021 (aggravated sexual assault) of the Penal Code. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 841.002(8)(A). The Act also defines a sexually violent offense as an offense under section 30.02 (burglary) of the Penal Code "if the offense is punishable under Subsection (d) of that section and the person committed the offense with the intent to commit" an offense listed in paragraph (A) or (B). See id. at § 841.002(8)(C). Wiley disputes that his 1995 burglary conviction qualifies as a sexually violent offense. For the third time, we disagree.

Paragraph (B) referencing section 20.04 of the Penal Code relates to aggravated kidnapping.

Pursuant to Wiley's July 1995 conviction, without the effective consent of the owner, Wiley entered a habitation, and committed or attempted to commit aggravated sexual assault. The record speaks for itself, and that offense-the offense of burglary, punishable under subsection (d) of section 30.02 of the Texas Penal Code is, by definition, a sexually violent offense. It is simply not any more complicated than that.

Wiley's Second Motion for En Banc Reconsideration is denied.


Summaries of

In re Wiley

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Dec 7, 2021
No. 07-20-00039-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 7, 2021)
Case details for

In re Wiley

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: THE COMMITMENT OF ANTHONY BERNARD WILEY

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo

Date published: Dec 7, 2021

Citations

No. 07-20-00039-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 7, 2021)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Rhodes (In re Adams)

It is simply not any more complicated that that." See In re Commitment of Wiley, No. 07-20-00039-CV,…

In re The Commitment of Koelzer

It is simply not any more complicated than that." See In re Commitment of Wiley, No. 07-20-00039-CV,…