From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Viscount Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1399 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 509227.

November 18, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Viscount Washington, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Lahtinen, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.


As the result of an ongoing investigation, petitioner, a prison inmate, was served with a misbehavior report charging him with drug possession and smuggling. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of drug possession. That determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, and petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, testimony of the investigating officer, confidential reports and testimony of the confidential informant who purchased marihuana from petitioner provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Shabazz v Artus, 72 AD3d 1299, 1300; Matter of Mitchell v Bezio, 69 AD3d 1281, 1281). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the Hearing Officer made a proper assessment of the confidential informant's reliability by conducting an independent examination in camera ( see Matter of Parker v Fischer, 70 AD3d 1086, 1087). Additionally, contrary to his contention, petitioner had no right to access the confidential information ( see Matter of Perretti v Fischer, 58 AD3d 999, 1002, lv denied 12 NY3d 709). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Viscount Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1399 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Viscount Washington

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of VISCOUNT WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 18, 2010

Citations

78 A.D.3d 1399 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8411
910 N.Y.S.2d 706

Citing Cases

Brooks v. Fischer

The misbehavior report, testimony of the correction officers who investigated the incident and testimony of a…

Wilson v. Annucci

McDuffy v. Fischer, 107 AD3d 1190. See also Hall v. Fischer, 101 AD3d 1309, Washington v. Fischer, 78 AD3d…