From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jeney

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 25, 2012
208 N.J. 591 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

2012-01-25

In the Matter of Robert Joseph JENEY, Jr., an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 030691984).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11–278, concluding that ROBERT JOSEPH JENEY, JR., of SCOTCH PLAINS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard property belonging to a client or a third party), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT JOSEPH JENEY, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Jeney

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 25, 2012
208 N.J. 591 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Jeney

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Robert Joseph JENEY, Jr., an Attorney at Law (Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

208 N.J. 591 (N.J. 2012)
34 A.3d 775

Citing Cases

In re Weil

See, e.g., In the Matter of Karl A. Fenske, supra, DRB 98-211 (May 25, 1999); In the Matter of Joel Albert,…

In re Jeney

In 2012, respondent received a reprimand for failure to safeguard the proceeds from the sale of his…