From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sutherland

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Dec 13, 2012
56 A.3d 1224 (D.C. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12–BG–1457.

2012-12-13

In re John A. SUTHERLAND, Jr., Respondent.


Bar Registration No. 358924, BDN: 300–09.
BEFORE: EASTERLY, Associate Judge, NEBEKER and KING, Senior Judges.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoking respondent's license to practice law in that jurisdiction, this court's October 3, 2012, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the functional equivalent reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that John A. Sutherland, Jr., is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent's suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).


Summaries of

In re Sutherland

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Dec 13, 2012
56 A.3d 1224 (D.C. 2012)
Case details for

In re Sutherland

Case Details

Full title:In re John A. SUTHERLAND, Jr., Respondent.

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Date published: Dec 13, 2012

Citations

56 A.3d 1224 (D.C. 2012)

Citing Cases

Hertzmark v. Lynch

He admitted that he withdrew from the corporation a few months before because he did not like the way things…

Cross, Trustee, v. So. Coal Coke Co.

"16. Because the Court erred in refusing to charge the plaintiff's tenth request to charge to the following…