Opinion
2023-00245VI
10-18-2023
IN RE: HANNAH C. SUES HANNAH C. SUES Applicant
Sent to S.C. Reporter 2/27/23
ORDER
Lisa L. Sadler, Judge
{¶1} On August 31, 2023, a hearing was held in this matter before a Magistrate of this court. On September 19, 2023, the Magistrate issued a Decision wherein she found that applicant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that she qualifies as a victim of criminally injurious conduct as defined in R.C. 2743.51 for incidents that occurred on September 21, 2020, November 23, 2021, February 1, 2022, and February 6, 2022.
{¶2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: "A party may file written objections to a magistrate's decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i)." No objections were filed.
{¶3} Upon review of the claim file, and the Magistrate's Decision, it is the Court's finding that the Magistrate was correct in her analysis of the issues and application of the law. Accordingly, this court adopts the Magistrate's Decision and recommendation as its own.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
{¶4} The September 19, 2023 Decision of the Magistrate is ADOPTED;
{¶5} This claim is DENIED and judgment entered for the Attorney General;
{¶6} Costs assumed by the reparations fund.