From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Streit

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 10, 2018
236 N.J. 118 (N.J. 2018)

Opinion

D-76 September Term 2017 080635

12-10-2018

In the MATTER OF Martin S. STREIT, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 266881971)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-275, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14(a)(4)(E), Martin S. Streit, formerly of Fort Lee, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, and whose license to practice law in New Jersey has been administratively revoked since August 28, 2017, pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c), should be suspended from practice for a period of one year based on discipline imposed in New York for unethical conduct that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 1.1(a)(gross neglect) RPC 5.5(a)(1)(practicing law while suspended), RPC 8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and (RPC 8.4(d)(conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And the Court having determined in its review of this matter that no further action on the disciplinary matter need be taken unless respondent seeks to be readmitted to practice in New Jersey;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that judgment in this matter is reserved; respondent shall immediately inform the Clerk of the Supreme Court if he seeks to be readmitted to the practice of law in New Jersey, whether with a plenary license, a limited license, pro hac vice, as a multijurisdictional practitioner, or in any other manner; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State.


Summaries of

In re Streit

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 10, 2018
236 N.J. 118 (N.J. 2018)
Case details for

In re Streit

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Martin S. STREIT, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Dec 10, 2018

Citations

236 N.J. 118 (N.J. 2018)
198 A.3d 294

Citing Cases

In re Yohan Choi

Citing R. 1:20-14(a)(4), the OAE maintained that respondent's conduct in New York warrants substantially…