From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 2004
11 A.D.3d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-10819

October 4, 2004.

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Tovarick Bautista appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated September 22, 2003, as granted the petition to the extent of directing him to provide pre-arbitration discovery.

Before: Altman, J.P., Florio, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the appellant to provide pre-arbitration discovery ( see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Moya, 288 AD2d 309; Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 287 AD2d 640; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Baez, 269 AD2d 392; Matter of State Farm Ins. Co. v. McManus, 249 AD2d 311).


Summaries of

In re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 2004
11 A.D.3d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 4, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
782 N.Y.S.2d 372

Citing Cases

In re Appl. of Ins. of State of Pa. v. Edkins

Accordingly, it is incumbent upon the party seeking disclosure in an arbitrable dispute to demonstrate that…

Mtr. of State Farm Mutual Automobile

Therefore, so much of the appeal as challenges the temporary stay must be dismissed as academic ( see Matter…