From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Mandala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2001
284 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued May 21, 2001.

June 18, 2001.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, Mary Mandala appeals from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Shaughnessy, J.), entered May 25, 2000, which, after a hearing, granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration.

Huwel Mulhern, Franklin Square, N.Y. (George A. Huwel of counsel), for appellant.

Martin, Fallon Mullé, Huntington, N.Y. (Richard C. Mullé and Christina J. Lee of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the amended order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration. Although the petitioner did not commence this proceeding within the statutory time period (see, CPLR 7503[c]), an application to stay arbitration filed after the statutory time period may be entertained when, as here, it is based on a contention that the parties did not agree to arbitrate a claim for which no coverage was provided under the policy (see, Matter of Matarasso [Continental Cas. Co.], 56 N.Y.2d 264; Matter of United Community Ins. Co. v. Gabriel, 229 A.D.2d 444). The appellant did not qualify as an insured under the policy and, therefore, no agreement to arbitrate existed between her and the petitioner (see, Matter of Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. v. Cartigiano, 178 A.D.2d 472).

SANTUCCI, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Mandala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2001
284 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In re State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Mandala

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 860

Citing Cases

Interboro Ins. Co. v. Maragh

Resolution of the factual issue as to whether Maragh was an insured under the subject policy is a condition…

In re Eagle Insurance Company v. Perez

Although Eagle failed to commence this proceeding within the statutory time period (see CPLR 7503[c]), a stay…