From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sobel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 1, 2021
193 A.D.3d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

PM–42–21

04-01-2021

In the MATTER OF Larry D. SOBEL, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 1923382)

Larry D. Sobel, Marina del Rey, California, pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Larry D. Sobel, Marina del Rey, California, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Per Curiam. Larry D. Sobel was admitted to practice by this Court in 1984 and lists a business address in Los Angeles, California with the Office of Court Administration. Sobel now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney.

As is noted by AGC, Sobel is presently delinquent in his New York attorney registration requirements, having failed to register for the biennial period beginning in 2020 (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1). Inasmuch as Sobel is therefore subject to potential disciplinary action (see Judiciary Law § 468–a [5] ; Rules of Professional Conduct [ 22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 8.4[d]; see also Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1021, 979 N.Y.S.2d 548 [2014] ), he is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and his application must be denied (see Matter of Cluff, 148 A.D.3d 1346, 1346, 47 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ). Further, any future application by Sobel must be supported by proof of his full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468–a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (see Matter of Frank, 146 A.D.3d 1228, 1228–1229, 46 N.Y.S.3d 434 [2017] ).

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that Larry D. Sobel's application for permission to resign is denied.


Summaries of

In re Sobel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 1, 2021
193 A.D.3d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

In re Sobel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Larry D. Sobel, an Attorney.

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 1, 2021

Citations

193 A.D.3d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
193 A.D.3d 1174
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 2052