From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Smolen v. B.O.E., City School Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 2003
304 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-00730

Argued March 31, 2003.

April 28, 2003.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Board of Education of the City School District of New York, dated September 13, 2000, terminating the petitioner's employment as a probationary teacher, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated November 26, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Mark Smolen, East Meadow, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Leonard Koerner and Ellen B. Fishman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, LEO F. McGINITY, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner failed to demonstrate that his probationary term commenced prior to the date of his formal appointment (see Melnick v. Board of Educ., 104 A.D.2d 943; cf. Ricca v. Board of Educ., 47 N.Y.2d 385). Thus, the petitioner could not have acquired tenure by estoppel at the time of his dismissal and was subject to the termination of his employment without a hearing.

The petitioner's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, McGINITY and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Smolen v. B.O.E., City School Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 2003
304 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In re Smolen v. B.O.E., City School Dist

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MARK SMOLEN, appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 28, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 888