From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 13, 2021
No. 03-21-00359-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 13, 2021)

Opinion

03-21-00359-CV

08-13-2021

In re Jerel Smith


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARI L. KELLY, JUSTICE

Relator Jerel Smith has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Relator requests that this Court compel the district clerk to allow Relator to use service of process by constable in his underlying lawsuit.

We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(a); In re Ramos, No. 03-21-00297-CV, 2021 WL 2793468, at *1 (Tex. App.-Austin July 6, 2021, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Smith has failed to provide an adequate record of his filings with the district court or otherwise demonstrate that issuing mandamus against the district clerk is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.7(a); In re Ramos, 2021 WL 2793468, at *1.

Although Smith has requested mandamus relief for the purpose of having defendant served in the underlying lawsuit, we note the trial court docket reflects that the defendant was already served on July 21, 2021 by a Travis County constable.

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

In re Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 13, 2021
No. 03-21-00359-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 13, 2021)
Case details for

In re Smith

Case Details

Full title:In re Jerel Smith

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Aug 13, 2021

Citations

No. 03-21-00359-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 13, 2021)

Citing Cases

In re Smith

See In re Smith, No. 03-23-00287-CV, 2023 WL 4277360, at *1 (Tex. App.-Austin June 30, 2023, orig.…