From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Skolinsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 2010
70 A.D.3d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-03304.

February 9, 2010.

In a probate proceeding, the objectants Maureen Barry, JoRita DeFrancesco, Daniel P. Flynn, Robert J. Higgins, Patricia M. Hornik, and Adrian Leahy appeal from so much of an order of the Surrogate's Court, Putnam County (Reitz, S.), dated January 22, 2009, as denied that branch of their motion pursuant to SCPA 1404 which was to compel the disclosure of certain documents.

Kieffer and Hahn LLP, New York, N.Y. (Michael C. Devine of counsel), for objectants-appellants.

Bleakley Platt Schmidt, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Nancy J. Rudolph, Susan E. Galvo, and Jason G. Neroulias of counsel), for respondent.

Michael Keating, White Plains, N.Y. (Susan R. Nudelman and Bernadette Kenny of counsel), for intervenor-respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Hall, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondent and the intervenor-respondent.

Parties are entitled to disclosure of all matter "material and necessary" to prosecution of the action (CPLR 3101 [a]; see Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 NY2d 403, 406; Trimarco v Data Treasury Corp., 59 AD3d 615). Upon an in camera inspection of the documents at issue here, consisting of the minutes of the General Council meetings of the intervenor Friars of Atonement, Inc., from March 16, 1985, through March 15, 1990, the Surrogate's Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellants' motion which was to compel production of those minutes ( see Andon v 302-304 Mott St. Assoc., 94 NY2d 740, 745; Vyas v Campbell, 4 AD3d 417, 418).

The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.

The intervener's remaining contention has been rendered academic in light of our determination.


Summaries of

In re Skolinsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 2010
70 A.D.3d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Skolinsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of RONALD JOHN SKOLINSKY, Deceased. ELAINE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 9, 2010

Citations

70 A.D.3d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 972
892 N.Y.S.2d 913

Citing Cases

Wunderlich v. Liberty Meadows, LLC

CPLR 3101(a) broadly mandates "full disclosure of all matter material and necessary in the prosecution or…

Wadolowski v. Cohen

“Parties are entitled to disclosure of all matter ‘material and necessary’ to prosecution of the action” (…