From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sirkin

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 8, 2009
200 N.J. 271 (N.J. 2009)

Opinion

October 8, 2009.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-148, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that KENNETH P. SIRKIN of BOYTON BEACH, FLORIDA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1999, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client informed of status of case), and RPC 8.1(B) (failure to cooperate), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KENNETH P. SIRKIN is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule 1:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Sirkin

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 8, 2009
200 N.J. 271 (N.J. 2009)
Case details for

In re Sirkin

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF KENNETH P. SIRKIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 8, 2009

Citations

200 N.J. 271 (N.J. 2009)
979 A.2d 768

Citing Cases

In re Dwyer

Longo's CEPA claims had value, yet respondent let them languish, unresolved. In In re Sirkin, 200 N.J. 271…

In re Beran

ient, failed to promptly disburse property belonging to a third party, failed to maintain a bona fide office,…