From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Shorter

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Apr 2, 1998
707 A.2d 1305 (D.C. 1998)

Summary

noting that the conduct of respondent was serious and that respondent had a record of prior discipline

Summary of this case from In re Ford

Opinion

No. 97-BG-1724.

Submitted March 11, 1998.

Decided April 2, 1998.

Before SCHWELB and RUIZ, Associate Judges, and GALLAGHER, Senior Judge.


The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that John A. Shorter, Jr., a member of the Bar of this court, be publicly censured for violations of Rules 1.1(a), 1.3(a), and 8.4(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The proposed discipline arises from Shorter's failure to prepare for trial in two cases involving a criminal defendant whom Shorter was representing pro bono and from Shorter's conduct in leaving certain grand jury transcripts with his client, in violation of a protective order issued by the court.

The Board recognized, as do we, that Shorter's conduct was serious and that Shorter has a record of prior discipline. The Board concluded, however, that the violations are not likely to be repeated and that "[a] more severe sanction [than public censure] is therefore not required to protect the public, clients, or the courts from further conduct of this character by Respondent."

Given the seriousness of the violations and the record of prior discipline, a more severe sanction might not have been unreasonable. Neither Bar Counsel nor Shorter has filed an exception to the Board's Report, however, and our review of the Board's recommendation is narrowly circumscribed. See D.C.Bar R. XI, § 9(g); In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285, 1288 (D.C. 1995). Primarily in light of the deferential standard required by these authorities, we adopt the recommendation of the Board. Accordingly, John A. Shorter, Jr. is hereby publicly censured, and it is so ordered.


Summaries of

In re Shorter

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Apr 2, 1998
707 A.2d 1305 (D.C. 1998)

noting that the conduct of respondent was serious and that respondent had a record of prior discipline

Summary of this case from In re Ford
Case details for

In re Shorter

Case Details

Full title:In re John A. SHORTER, Jr., Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 2, 1998

Citations

707 A.2d 1305 (D.C. 1998)

Citing Cases

In re Ford

Substantially for the reasons stated in the Board's Order, we accept the Board's recommendation to dismiss…

In re Bland

While "a more severe sanction may not have been unreasonable[, n]either Bar Counsel nor [respondent] has…