From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Shanell K.M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 2009
59 A.D.3d 201 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 5193.

February 10, 2009.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P. Roberts, J.), entered on or about October 15, 2007, which terminated respondent-appellant's parental rights to her daughter on the ground of permanent neglect, and committed custody of the child to petitioner and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Florian Miedell, New York, for appellant. John R. Eyerman, New York, for Family Support Systems Unlimited, Inc., respondent.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Judith Stern of counsel), Law Guardian.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Catterson, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.


The court's finding on permanent neglect was correct within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b. Petitioner scheduled regular visitation, made appropriate referrals to programs designed to address appellant's substance abuse problems and to improve her parenting skills, and repeatedly reminded her of the necessity of complying with the terms of her service plan and the consequences of failing to do so. This demonstrated, by clear and convincing evidence, petitioner's diligent efforts, tailored to appellant's individual situation, to remedy the obstacles barring family reunification and thereby strengthen the relationship between appellant and her daughter ( see § 384-b [7] [a], [f]; Matter of Sheila G., 61 NY2d 368, 373; Matter of Star A., 55 NY2d 560, 564).

The preponderance of the evidence also established that despite such diligent efforts, appellant failed, during the relevant statutory period, to sufficiently maintain contact with and plan for the return of the child ( see § 384-b [7] [a]). Appellant never completed parenting skills classes or a drug treatment program on an inpatient or outpatient basis, nor did she undergo counseling, and she actually visited with the child while under the influence of drugs. This constituted failure to comply with the terms of the service plan petitioner had prepared for her ( see Matter of Sean LaMonte Vonta M., 54 AD3d 635; Matter of Angel P., 44 AD3d 448).


Summaries of

In re Shanell K.M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 2009
59 A.D.3d 201 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Shanell K.M

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHANELL K.M., a Child Alleged to be Permanently…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 201 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 985
873 N.Y.S.2d 40

Citing Cases

In re Brookes Mc. Catholic Guardian

Contrary to the mother's, contention, the petitioner Catholic Guardian Society and Home Bureau (hereinafter…

In re Sansa

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.…