From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Senate Resolution No. 9

Supreme Court of Colorado
Apr 16, 1976
548 P.2d 602 (Colo. 1976)

Opinion

No. 27181

Decided April 16, 1976.

Interrogatories propounded by Senate Resolution No. 9 of the Second Regular Session of the 50th General Assembly of Colorado

Declination to Render Opinion

1. COURTSInterrogatories — Senate — Validity — Statute Adopted — Supreme Court — Declination. Supreme Court will not answer interrogatories propounded by senate resolution concerning the validity or construction of a statute which has already been adopted.

2. LEGISLATUREQuestions — Supreme Court — Pending Legislation. Legislative questions propounded to Supreme Court concerning the validity or construction of a statute must be connected with pending legislation.

3. COURTSSupreme Court — Opinion — Interrogatories — Difficult Issues — Adversary Setting — Declination. Supreme Court would decline to render an opinion answering interrogatories propounded by senate resolution where difficult issues are involved which should be considered only in an adversary setting.


The court respectfully declines to render an opinion answering the interrogatories propounded by Senate Resolution No. 9 of the Second Regular Session of the 50th General Assembly of Colorado. Our reasons are as follows:

[1, 2] We know of no case in which this court has answered interrogatories concerning the validity or construction of a statute which has already been adopted. "Legislative questions must be connected with pending legislation." In the Matter of the Constitutionality of Senate Bill No. 65, 12 Colo. 466, 21 P. 478 (1889). See also In re House Resolution No. 12, 88 Colo. 569, 298 P. 960 (1931); In re Interrogatories of the House of Representatives, 62 Colo. 188, 162 P. 1144 (1916); In re Senate Resolution, 54 Colo. 262, 130 P. 333 (1913); In re Senate Bill No. 416, 45 Colo. 394, 101 P. 410 (1909); and In re University Fund, 18 Colo. 398, 33 P. 415 (1893). We conclude that we should not depart from precedent.

[3] Difficult issues are involved which should be considered only in an adversary setting. See In re Interrogatories Propounded by the Senate Concerning House Bill 456, 131 Colo. 389, 281 P.2d 101 (1955); and In re Interrogatories of the Governor, 111 Colo. 406, 141 P.2d 899 (1943).

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE PRINGLE and MR. JUSTICE DAY do not participate.


Summaries of

In re Senate Resolution No. 9

Supreme Court of Colorado
Apr 16, 1976
548 P.2d 602 (Colo. 1976)
Case details for

In re Senate Resolution No. 9

Case Details

Full title:In Re Senate Resolution No. 9

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado

Date published: Apr 16, 1976

Citations

548 P.2d 602 (Colo. 1976)
548 P.2d 602

Citing Cases

No. 77-5

The Supreme Court shall give its opinion upon important questions upon solemn occasions when required by the…