Opinion
11-02-2016
In the Matter of SASHA J.J. (Anonymous). Putnam County Department of Social Services, respondent; Danielle L. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Janiya R.J. (Anonymous). Putnam County Department of Social Services, respondent; Danielle L. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2).
Arza Rayches Feldman, Uniondale, NY (Steven Feldman of counsel), for appellant. Robert A. Noah, Carmel, NY, for respondent. Martin N. Ashley, Somers, NY, attorney for the children.
Arza Rayches Feldman, Uniondale, NY (Steven Feldman of counsel), for appellant.
Robert A. Noah, Carmel, NY, for respondent.
Martin N. Ashley, Somers, NY, attorney for the children.
Appeal from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Putnam County (James T. Rooney, J.), entered April 17, 2015. The order, upon the mother's consent to an entry of fact-finding without admission, and upon her failure to appear at a dispositional hearing, found that the mother neglected the child Darien M. and derivatively neglected the children Janiya J. and Sasha J., and, inter alia, directed the mother to comply with certain terms and conditions.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner commenced these proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10 alleging that the mother neglected the child Darien M. by using excessive corporal punishment, and derivatively neglected the children Janiya J. and Sasha J. During the presentation of the petitioner's case at the fact-finding hearing, an agreement was reached by the parties that the mother would consent to the entry of an order of fact-finding without admission pursuant to Family Court Act § 1051(a). Subsequently, the mother failed to appear for a dispositional hearing on March 10, 2015, and, in her absence, the court granted the dispositional relief requested by the petitioner. In an order of fact-finding and disposition entered April 17, 2015, the court found that the mother neglected the child Darien M. and derivatively neglected the children Janiya J. and Sasha J., and it directed the mother to comply with certain terms and conditions. The mother appeals from that order.
The mother is not aggrieved by so much of the order as found that she neglected the child Darien M. and derivatively neglected the children Janiya J. and Sasha J., as those portions of the order were entered upon her consent (see CPLR 5511 ; Matter of Robert Jordan G. [Robert D.], 97 A.D.3d 576, 577, 947 N.Y.S.2d 334 ; Matter of Enasysia Tylesha R. [April Deann R.], 83 A.D.3d 946, 947, 920 N.Y.S.2d 712 ; Matter of Spelman v. Spelman, 81 A.D.3d 837, 838, 916 N.Y.S.2d 810 ; Matter of Reilly v. Reilly, 49 A.D.3d 883, 884, 853 N.Y.S.2d 900 ). Nor is she aggrieved by the dispositional portions of the order that were made upon her default (see CPLR 5511 ; Matter of Angelina K. [Jessica W.], 140 A.D.3d 877, 33 N.Y.S.3d 405 ; Matter of Yu F. [Fen W.], 122 A.D.3d 761, 762, 996 N.Y.S.2d 186 ; Matter of Lucinda A. [Luba A.], 120 A.D.3d 492, 493, 990 N.Y.S.2d 627 ). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. To the extent that the mother contends that she did not voluntarily consent to the finding of neglect, the mother must move in the Family Court to vacate or resettle the order (see Elsayed v. Edrees, 141 A.D.3d 503, 504, 35 N.Y.S.3d 411 ; Matter of Strang v. Rathbone, 108 A.D.3d 565, 968 N.Y.S.2d 572 ).
MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.