From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rudnick

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 22, 2022
No. D-166-2020 (N.J. Mar. 22, 2022)

Opinion

D-166-2020

03-22-2022

In the Matter of Jonathan S. Rudnick, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 034721990)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 21-005, concluding that Jonathan S. Rudnick of Tinton Falls, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b)(failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and to comply with reasonable requests for information), RPC 1.4(c)(failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation), and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation);

And good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that Jonathan S. Rudnickis hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

WITNESS, the Honorable Stuart Rabner, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 22ndday of March, 2022.


Summaries of

In re Rudnick

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 22, 2022
No. D-166-2020 (N.J. Mar. 22, 2022)
Case details for

In re Rudnick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Jonathan S. Rudnick, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 22, 2022

Citations

No. D-166-2020 (N.J. Mar. 22, 2022)

Citing Cases

In re Schlachter

A reprimand or censure may be imposed even if the misrepresentation is accompanied by other, non-serious…