From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rosenberg v. Colonial Penn Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 2000
274 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued May 11, 2000

July 24, 2000.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to compel arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Colonial Penn Insurance Co., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.H.O.), which, in effect, granted the petition and denied its cross petition to stay arbitration.

Bryan M. Rothenberg, Mineola, N.Y. (Joseph Candela of counsel), for appellant.

Stanford Kaplan, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent-respondent Peerless Insurance Company.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent-respondent Peerless Insurance Company.

The record does not support the contention of the appellant, Colonial Penn Insurance Co., that the notice of cancellation of the insurance policy issued by Peerless Insurance Company to Ann Marie Smith was untimely filed with the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles because of an uncorrected "edit error" within the meaning of 15 NYCRR 34.2(b). Accordingly, the Hearing Officer properly concluded that the policy had been cancelled and there was no coverage at the time of the accident (see, Matter of Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Vidale, 207 A.D.2d 489; see also, Matter of Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v. Martich, 260 A.D.2d 378).


Summaries of

In re Rosenberg v. Colonial Penn Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 2000
274 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

In re Rosenberg v. Colonial Penn Insurance

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF RISE ROSENBERG, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. COLONIAL PENN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 24, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
712 N.Y.S.2d 384

Citing Cases

In re of Progressive Northeastern v. Barnes

Pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 (2) (a), State Farm Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm) was…