From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ronnie M.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2012
94 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-04-24

In the Matter of RONNIE M. (Anonymous), appellant.


Glenn Gucciardo, Northport, N.Y., for appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, Ronnie M. appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Loguercio, J.), dated June 27, 2011, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, adjudged the appellant to be a person in need of supervision and directed that he be placed in the custody of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for a period of one year for placement with Hope for Youth.

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that the appellant, Ronnie M., was a person in need of supervision. Further, it did not err in placing the appellant in the custody of the Department of Social Services (hereinafter the DSS) for a period of one year for placement in a residential treatment facility. After finding beyond a reasonable doubt ( see Family Ct. Act § 744 [b] ), after a fact-finding hearing, that the appellant had engaged in repeated acts of physically and verbally violent behavior, threats, and acts of defiance and disobedience ( see Matter of Jonathan D., 297 A.D.2d 400, 401, 746 N.Y.S.2d 206; Matter of Edwin G., 296 A.D.2d 7, 8, 742 N.Y.S.2d 53; cf. Matter of Anna “AA”, 36 A.D.2d 1001, 1002, 321 N.Y.S.2d 59), the Family Court correctly determined, upon a preponderance of the evidence ( see Family Ct. Act § 745[b] ), after a dispositional hearing, that reasonable efforts had been made prior to the dispositional hearing to prevent the need for removal of the appellant from his home ( see Family Ct. Act §§ 745, 754[2]; Matter of Alexander C., 83 A.D.3d 1058, 1059, 922 N.Y.S.2d 186). The Family Court also properly found, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the appellant's needs and best interests, as well as the need for protection of the community, were best served by his placement with the DSS in residential treatment outside the home ( see Family Ct. Act §§ 745, 754[2]; Matter of Ashlie B., 37 A.D.3d 997, 830 N.Y.S.2d 809; Matter of Jeremy L., 220 A.D.2d 908, 909, 632 N.Y.S.2d 682; cf. Matter of Jessica PP., 23 A.D.3d 953, 804 N.Y.S.2d 463).

SKELOS, J.P., FLORIO, ENG and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Ronnie M.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2012
94 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

In re Ronnie M.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RONNIE M. (Anonymous), appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 24, 2012

Citations

94 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
942 N.Y.S.2d 812
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3195

Citing Cases

In re Catherine B.

The determination of whether to revoke a prior dispositional order of probation and proceed to make a new…