From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Roberto A., v. Altagracia A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 2010
73 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2769.

May 11, 2010.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Douglas Hoffman, J.), entered on or about July 1, 2009, which, upon a finding of mental illness, terminated respondent's parental rights to the subject child and committed the child's custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Bahn Herzfeld Multer, New York (Richard L. Herzfeld of counsel), for appellant.

Quinlan Fields, Hawthorne (Jeremiah Quinlan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.


Unrebutted expert psychiatric testimony, together with medical and agency records, constitute clear and convincing evidence that respondent suffers from paranoid schizophrenia rendering her unable to properly and adequately care for her special-needs child presently and for the foreseeable future ( see Matter of Genesis S. [Irene Elizabeth S.], 70 AD3d 570; Matter of Loretta C, 32 AD3d 764). In cases of termination of parental rights by reason of mental illness, there is no requirement that the agency show that it made diligent efforts to reunite the child with the parent ( Matter of Jon C, 305 AD2d 592, 593; Matter of Belinda S., 189 AD2d 679, lv denied 81 NY2d 706).


Summaries of

In re Roberto A., v. Altagracia A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 2010
73 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Roberto A., v. Altagracia A.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERTO A., an Infant. ALTAGRACIA A., Appellant; NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 11, 2010

Citations

73 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4049
899 N.Y.S.2d 839

Citing Cases

W.Z. v. Good Shepherd Serv. (In re K.Y.Z.)

The court properly drew a negative inference from the mother’s failure to testify (seeMatter of Alford Isaiah…

Sharon D. v. Children's Aid Soc'y (In re Ariella D.)

would be at risk of becoming neglected (see Social Services Law § 384-b[6][e]; see also Matter of Savannah…