From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Robert Lee v. Brunelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1996
231 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

September 27, 1996.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed.

Before: Present Denman, P.J., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ .


Supreme Court erred in annulling respondents' determination that petitioner was ineligible to participate in a temporary release program. An inmate convicted of a violent felony is not eligible to participate in a temporary release program if the crime involved either the use or threatened use of a dangerous instrument or deadly weapon ( see, Gov. Pataki's Executive Order No. 5 [ 9 NYCRR 5.5], filed Jan. 24, 1995; 7 NYCRR 1900.4 [c] [1] [ii]). Here, petitioner was convicted of three counts of robbery in the second degree, a violent felony, and respondents had facts before them establishing that petitioner threatened one cab driver with a gun and another with a knife during two of the robberies. Thus, respondents properly determined that he was not eligible for temporary release.


We have reviewed the remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. — CPLR art 78.)


Summaries of

In re Robert Lee v. Brunelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1996
231 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Robert Lee v. Brunelle

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT LEE, Respondent, v. CHARLES BRUNELLE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1996

Citations

231 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 66

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Vaughan v. Goord

"Participation in a temporary release program is a privilege, not a right ( see Correction Law § 855), and…