From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Robert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 12, 1996
231 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Summary

In Matter of Robert R., 231 A.D.2d 406, 647 N.Y.S.2d 199 (1996), we affirmed the denial of a motion to suppress a gun in analyzing circumstances similar to those raised here.

Summary of this case from People v. Bilal

Opinion

September 12, 1996.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered December 20, 1995, which adjudicated respondent-appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the Division for Youth, limited secure, for 12 months, following a fact-finding determination, based upon his admission that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Rubin and Williams, JJ.


Family Court properly denied respondent's motion to suppress the gun. The police radio transmission of "shots fired" at a particular location, the information from a civilian at that location confirming that shots had been fired and providing a description and the direction of flight of a male who had fled with other people, the arresting officer's encounter with a group of males 15 minutes later four or five blocks away, one of whom, not respondent, matched the description provided, and respondent's flight when told to stop by the officer gave rise to reasonable suspicion justifying pursuit ( Matter of Jerry C, 197 AD2d 685; People v Sloan, 178 AD2d 624, lv denied 79 NY2d 953; People v Wider, 172 AD2d 573). Since the initial approach and subsequent pursuit of respondent constituted legitimate, justifiable police conduct, the recovery of the knapsack and the gun inside abandoned during the flight was also lawful ( Matter of Jerry C, supra).


Summaries of

In re Robert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 12, 1996
231 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

In Matter of Robert R., 231 A.D.2d 406, 647 N.Y.S.2d 199 (1996), we affirmed the denial of a motion to suppress a gun in analyzing circumstances similar to those raised here.

Summary of this case from People v. Bilal
Case details for

In re Robert

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT R., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 12, 1996

Citations

231 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
647 N.Y.S.2d 199

Citing Cases

People v. Bilal

Nor are we persuaded by the cases relied on by Justice Tom's dissent. The dissent primarily relies upon…

People v. Pena

of the teenagers who attacked two homeless people, which was provided by several eyewitnesses and included…