From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Roberson

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 3, 2012
210 N.J. 220 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-3

In the Matter of James O. ROBERSON, An Attorney at Law.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11–262, concluding that the formal ethics complaint in Docket No. XIV–2008–045E filed against JAMES O. ROBERSON, formerly of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, and who has been suspended from the practice of law since April 26, 2002, should be dismissed, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal ethics complaint filed against JAMES O. ROBERSON in Docket No. XIV–200S–045E is hereby dismissed; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension imposed by prior Orders of this Court, until further Order, and shall continue to comply with Rule 1:20–20 dealing with suspended attorneys.


Summaries of

In re Roberson

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 3, 2012
210 N.J. 220 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Roberson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of James O. ROBERSON, An Attorney at Law.

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: May 3, 2012

Citations

210 N.J. 220 (N.J. 2012)
43 A.3d 443

Citing Cases

In re Speck

We do not find, however, that respondent was never put on notice of such an allegation, nor afforded the…

In re Phillips

Thus, we find that, under RPC 1.15(a), respondent knowingly misappropriated the funds claimed by the trustee.…