From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re R.M.

Supreme Court of California
Jun 24, 2009
97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 272 (Cal. 2009)

Opinion


Page __

__ Cal.4th __ 211 P.3d 1061, 97 Cal.Rptr.3d 272 In re. R.M. No. S173166 Supreme Court of California June 24, 2009

         Prior Report: __ Cal.App. __, 93 Cal.Rptr.3d 316.

          OPINION

          Review granted on the court’s own motion; transferred to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One.

          The request to order review on the Court’s own motion is granted.

          The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One, to vacate its opinion and reconsider the matter as it sees fit.

         GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, MORENO, and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re R.M.

Supreme Court of California
Jun 24, 2009
97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 272 (Cal. 2009)
Case details for

In re R.M.

Case Details

Full title:In re. R.M.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jun 24, 2009

Citations

97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 272 (Cal. 2009)
211 P.3d 1061

Citing Cases

Wilkes v. Benihana, Inc.

Like the parties to this case, California appellate decisions have also disagreed about whether tip-pooling…

Doe v. Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego

Both decisions are currently on review before our Supreme Court. ( Quarry v. Doe 1 (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th…